I need to pause before writing this recap, because something in the data doesn't add up and I want to flag it honestly rather than publish something misleading.

The pace figures don't match a 10K race.

A 10K is 6.2 miles. At a pace of ~75–79 min/mile, finishing a 10K would take roughly 465–490 minutes (nearly 8 hours). But a 75:45/mile pace over 6.2 miles would yield a finish time of about 7 hours 50 minutes — which is exactly what's listed as Will Crisp's total. That's not a 10K pace; that's a walking pace over a much longer distance, or these times represent something else entirely (a cumulative event, a multi-leg total, or a data formatting issue where the "total" is in a different unit than it appears).

For context: a typical 10K finish time for age-group runners ranges from roughly 45 minutes to 90 minutes, with paces in the 7–15 min/mile range — not 75+ min/mile.

I won't write the recap as if these numbers make sense for a 10K, because doing so would produce fiction, not a race story.

Could you help clarify:

• Is this actually a longer event (marathon, ultra, or multi-stage) mislabeled as a 10K?
• Are the "total" times in seconds rather than hours:minutes:seconds?
• Is the pace in seconds/mile rather than minutes/mile?

Once the data is clarified, I'm glad to write the full recap accurately.